Archive

Author Archive

Salon.com & Mercedes – Good Idea, Blah Implementation

November 18th, 2002

Last week Salon.com announced a deal with Mercedes whereby the car co is offering a “f^ree Salon Premium Daypass” to everyone
who agrees to watch a four-screen online ad.

It’s a great idea.

However, I’m under whelmed by Salon’s execution of their barrier page in between the big offer banner on their home page and day-pass access to the sub site.

You’d think they’d try to get as many visitors to convert to day-pass offer accepters as possible so more people see Mercedes’ ad.
However, the page’s three-paragraphs of sales copy are too long-winded for a really high conversion rate. Guys, can you bullet point something please?

Also the final sentence before the entry button is off-putting enough in placement and wording to be costing some conversions as
well, “Important Note: Your browser must be set to accept cookies and you must also have the Flash Plug-in Verson 4 or higher.”
This probably would have been better tiny type next to the cceptance button. (BTW: For once the typo is *not* mine!)

It’s a good idea with so-so execution.

http://www.salon.com/partner/mb/

Subject Line or List Host Changes Can Cost You Readers

November 15th, 2002

Ever since I sent out my do-typos-stop-filtering survey to MarketingSherpa readers on Wednesday morning (results here) subscribers have been emailing me notes to explain why my issues are less filtered than I’d feared. Many say, “I added a ‘rule’ to my system to make sure newsletters with your subject line get
through” or “I made sure all email from your newsletter address gets through.”

Which is wonderful of them, but also makes me realize as a publisher that I could risk losing or not delivering to some of my most dedicated readers if I changed my subject line format, or switched list hosts so my newsletter from address was affected.

It’s the equivalent of cutting off all the people who had direct links to articles on your site when you switch content management
systems (a big problem for publishers upgrading). That can hurt your traffic and crush your search engine rankings.

http://www.MarketingSherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2207

Yahoo Groups Drop List Members After One Single Bounce

November 15th, 2002

Whoa, after one single bounce Yahoo Groups turns OFF accounts. My email service was down for a short time on Sunday night, a single
Yahoo Groups list I was on sent something during that time. Today I got a message reading

“Please reactivate your Yahoo! Groups account:
Recently, messages sent to you from Yahoo! Groups have been returned to us as undeliverable. To prevent any problems with
your email service, we have temporarily turned your Yahoo! Groups account OFF.

If you are reading this message now, the delivery problem appears to be fixed. However, we won’t know that the problem is fixed until you tell us.” (Huh?)

Most list owners cut off opt-ins after seven or 10 bounced messages in a row. I’ve never heard of anyone who cut off after one. I guess Yahoo is trying to cut back on server space and any excuse is a good excuse to cancel a free account. Independent groups and publishers who operate out of Yahoo groups should be aware of this: Your lists will start dwindling fast with this policy in place.

WSJ.com Eliminates Publisher Position

November 13th, 2002

Dow Jones, a company which has now admitted it’s paid for strippers(http://www.nypost.com/business/25970.htm) to help close ad sales deals, announced today it no longer wishes to pay for a anyone to be
Publisher of WSJ.com. Neil Budde is doing the “other opportunities” dance, and nobody is being hired or promoted to step into his old
shoes.

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/0,,SB1037991863714387948,00.html

Some site revamps leaving fewer options

November 13th, 2002

For the past few years I’ve had countless marketers and Web usability experts tell me, “Make sure your site pages are thin so they load quickly. People will leave your site rather than wait even an few extra seconds.”

Now there’s a new trend, it’s not just about thinning your page load, it’s about thinning your navigation options.

Most site revamps these days seem to be about taking stuff off, rather than adding stuff on.

In fact two of our Case Studies this week are about sites with few options. One site (MiningGold.com) only has a single option. You can click to buy, or you can click to leave. Another site (GoodysOnline.com) got rid of all of its impressive bells and whistles to focus on a simple offer for a discount coupon.

In a way, many companies’ home pages are becoming less like all-encompassing corporate doorways, and more like direct response reply cards.

Has your site gone skinnier? Let me know.. AHolland@MarketingSherpa.com

In the meantime, here’s Sherpa’s best stories from the past week:

====

CASE STUDIES:

====

#1. How to Go From Zilch Coverage to 200+ Media Interviews in 18 Months

Can you imagine if you called up the reporters who cover your marketplace, and they all said they’d never heard of you, or they thought you’d gone out of business?

That PR nightmare is exactly what happened to MAPICS, a 20-year old software firm serving manufacturers. Learn how MAPICS fought back, grabbing column inches from competitors like Oracle and SAP.

No, MAPICS didn’t stage any dramas or launch any revolutionary new products. Instead they relied on rock-solid PR best practices that you can emulate in order to get more press attention too: http://www.b2bmarketingbiz.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2197

#2. Goodys Chain Stores Test Emailed Discount Coupons

If you’ve been considering emailing discount coupons to your customers to see if you can drive some brick and mortar store traffic, absolutely check this Case Study out.

It includes some stunning metrics regarding average shopping cart size. We worried discount coupons might cannibalize normal sales. We were completely wrong: http://www.consumermarketingbiz.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2199

#3. Selling eBooks & Subscriptions to Consumers Online: 5 Hard Lessons from a Get-R*ich-Quick Publisher

It’s easy for we “serious” marketers to sneer a bit at the guys selling “how to get r*ich on the Internet” stuff. But, don’t you ever secretly wonder if there’s something you could learn from them? No matter how traditional and snooty your company is?

During the course of our research to create this Case Study, we learned five lessons that have already helped us out tremendously. Now it’s your turn. Yes, includes some (very) useful metrics: http://www.contentbiz.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2201

====

PRACTICAL KNOW HOW:

====

#4. Anne’s Marketing Column: How to Sell Your List – Part II

In Part II of this special report for email list owners, you’ll find:

-> 7 Tips on how much money you can make renting out your list

-> How to pick and compensate a list manager

-> What’s the difference between a manager and a broker

-> How to make sure no one spams your list

Also includes a link to Part I (in case you missed last week): http://www.MarketingSherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2198

#5. AOL’s EVP of Strategy Lon Otremba on Now That the Pop-Up Party’s Over…

Short but sweet. In this quick interview, AOL’s Lon Otremba suggests a few ways online advertisers can still get pretty good response rates, without relying on annoying interruptive spots: http://www.greatmindsinmarketing.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2202

#6. How to Plant Stories in Target Marketing & Inside DM

More than 45,000 direct marketing professionals read Target Marketing Magazine or its sister newsletter Inside DM. Check out our interview with Editor in Chief Hallie Mumert to find out how to influence her so your story reaches them: http://www.marketingfame.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2200

Oracle Offers Economist.com Subs to Get Email Names

November 12th, 2002

Thanks to Barbara Kaplowitz for sending me a link to this unusual co-op marketing campaign from TheEconomist.com and Oracle. She just got an emailed offer from TheEconomist.com (who apparently have no idea filters will hurt you if you use the word “f^ree” repeatedly in a broadcast message) that says that Oracle have
offered to pay for an Economist.com $69 subscription for her.

The only thing she has to do to get this site subscription is click on the link and hand over her email address with permission
to be added to Oracle’s email list.

They do not want the offer to go viral so unless you are Barbara, the offer will not work for you, but you can view the landing page
and privacy policy.

This is a very clever way for TheEconomist to get some sponsor dollars by in effect offering a co-reg. It is something other subscription sites might consider, as long as your universe is big enough that you are not scared silly of cannibalization.

However, as Barbara noted in her letter to me, “Have to admit, the really daunting privacy policy at Oracle made me consider not
accepting the deal.” If Oracle had added some benefit copy about why it’s cool to be on their list and/or at least given a non-
legalese-summary of their privacy policy, they would have done better with this campaign.

Also, it does make me wonder about the value of the list. Oracle is such a big broad company offering so many products, that I’m
not sure what they are planning to send these new o^pt-ins that is targeted and valuable enough content for the Company to get a
decent email readership % rate. We shall see.

http://www.economist.com/subscriptions/oracle.cfm

Sites with Fewer Navigation Options Win

November 7th, 2002

For the past few years I’ve had countless marketers and Web
usability experts tell me, “Make sure your site pages are thin so
they load quickly. People will leave your site rather than wait
even an few extra seconds.”

Now there’s a new trend, it’s not just about thinning your page
load, it’s about thinning your navigation options.

Most site revamps these days seem to be about taking stuff off,
rather than adding stuff on.

In fact two of our Case Studies this week are about sites with few
options. One site (MiningGold.com) only has a single option.
You can click to buy, or you can click to leave. Another site
(GoodysOnline.com) got rid of all of its impressive bells and
whistles to focus on a simple offer for a discount coupon.

In a way, many companies’ home pages are becoming less like all-
encompassing corporate doorways, and more like direct response
reply cards.

Has your site gone skinnier? Let me know.

SEO a Mainstream Marketing Vehicle

November 6th, 2002

Search Engine Optimization is finally a mainstream marketing vehicle.

In the early days of the SEO industry, the “experts” sounded disturbingly like those guys on infomercials for real estate investment with no money down. The sleaze factor of the early SEO industry (hard-sell, get-rich-quick) has had a long-term impact on the perception of SEO by mainstream marketers (and agencies) with major brands.

A press release from iProspect today announced that they had just renewed two major brands, FordDirect and Sharp Electronics, for two years contracts. Since we wrote the Buyer’s Guide to SEO Firms, I know that most SEO firms are still providing services on a month-to-month basis.

What a two-year contract tells me is that major brands are catching onto the idea that SEO is an infrastructure issue, like security, metrics, and hosting. While the industry still has a long way to go to reach respectability in the eyes of many (as long as Christine Hall keeps coming into my mailbox, true respectability will be elusive) clearly, two-year contracts say that SEO is a permanent part of the online marketing mix, and a permanent line in the marketing budget.

Fast Email Replies Make the Difference in Sales

November 1st, 2002

Over the past few weeks I have heard the same exact comment from every single B2B marketer I’ve spoken to about what makes the difference in sales in these tough times:

“Get back to every incoming email really, really quickly.”

Not within 24 hours. Not within sometime this business day. Within a handful of minutes. Half an hour max.

The point being to catch that customer or prospect while they are still on their computer, while they are still at their desk, before they get distracted, and most importantly, before your direct competitor (who prospects probably emailed 20 seconds after they emailed you) gets back to them first.

Very often the first company to respond gets the sale.

Which is why I’m bummed by survey results announced by Jupiter this Monday that out of 227 US companies contacted via email, 23% didn’t bother to respond within three days. Three days!

That kind of behavior hurts *all* of us, because it trains people to not expect an answer when they email a company. Do we really

want to train our customers and prospects to not bother to contact us via email? Do we really want to throw away sales?

This week our Tech Editor Alexis Gutzman reports on some more disturbing news for email marketers. Seems that consumers are reporting opt-in lists as s*pam. Her column is below.

Until next week, Anne

P.S. Many readers wrote in about my Blog last week to say, “I wish my NPR station would use the Internet more during fundraising drives.” Here’s a resource you can send your local station manager to in order to encourage that: http://www.webpledgetools.org

P.P.S. You can reach me at anneh@marketingsherpa.com, but if you need help with your subscription or questions about anything in SherpaStore, you’ll get a faster response from our Customer Service Manager Donna Pfledderer at service@sherpastore.com or (919) 975-1705. Thanks!

====

CASE STUDIES

====

#1. How Flexcar Gets a 72% Marketing Email Newsletter Open Rate

If your company operates in multiple locations, or has multiple product lines, or multiple buyer demographics, then you really should be considering publishing several different email newsletters.

But, who has time? Flexcar decided instead to create one ultra-personalized newsletter that adjusts itself to each subscriber. That may sound complicated (and expensive) but it’s really not. Check out this Case Study to learn how you can duplicate their success on a small budget: http://www.consumermarketingbiz.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2192

#2. Five Tactics Briefing.com Uses to Sell Subscriptions to Individual Investors Online

This Case Study has one very big stealable idea for a way to improve your Web site results. Read it and then test it out for yourself.

Most Web site changes lead to incremental growth. You change a bit of copy, or the color of a button, and voila .005% more of your visitors buy something. Which is to be celebrated. But once in a blue moon a single improvement makes a profound difference to he bottom line. Briefing.com found one that meant some visitors were four times more likely to buy. Learn what it was: http://www.contentbiz.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2194

#3. How to Retain Business Clients by Using Regular Emailed Surveys

Almost everyone surveys their customers occasionally to find out how they are doing. Business cleaning company Jani-King is n an incredibly competitive marketplace, so they decided to survey monthly.

How do you get clients to answer a survey that frequently? This Case Study provides great advice. Best bit: Jani-King’s emailed surveys are in the body of the email itself, so recipients don’t have to click over to a Web page to answer them. http://www.b2bmarketingbiz.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2191

====

PRACTICAL KNOW HOW

====

#4. Alexis’ Tech Column: Cloudmark Test Results Disturbing for Permission Emailers

Do you think your email campaigns or newsletters are safe from being filtered into the “junk” folder – or being reported to spam blacklists – because you are a pure-as-the-driven-snow permission marketer? Sorry, Alexis has some bad news for you… http://www.emailsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2196

#5. Anne’s Marketing Column: How to Sell Your List – Part I

Seems like everyone is trying to make an extra buck these days by renting out their email list. Worldata’s Jay Schwedelson says, “We’ve seen exponential growth of the number of list on the market. 18 months ago there were 3,000-4,000. Now it’s literally close to 20,000.”

But lots of those lists are “garbage” and many are selling for bottom-of-the-barrel pricing. Here’s useful advice on how to put your list on the market the “right” way — so anti-s*pam advocates won’t hate you, and so you actually make a decent profit: http://www.emailsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2195

#6. How to Get Mentioned in The Marketing Report

Thousands of B2B marketing and sales executives read the print subscription newsletter ‘The Marketing Report’ twice monthly. Want to get your name or story in front of them? Find out how from our interview with Editorial Director Pieter VanBennekom: http://www.marketingfame.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2193

#7. How to Combine Location Videography + Focus Groups: Rubbermaid’s 5 Steps for Market Research

When Rubbermaid’s Commercial Products Division wanted to research new ideas for the restaurant marketplace, they realized focus groups alone wouldn’t do the job. They needed action footage of real kitchens. If you’re involved in location-related market research, check out this interview to get tips on combining video and focus groups: http://www.greatmindsinmarketing.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2190

Email Response Speed Linked to Sales

October 31st, 2002

Over the past few weeks I’ve heard the same exact comment from
every single B2B marketer I’ve spoken to about what makes the
difference in sales in these tough times:

“Get back to every incoming email really, really quickly.”

Not within 24 hours. Not within sometime this business day.
Within a handful of minutes. Half an hour max.

The point being to catch that customer or prospect while they are
still on their computer, while they are still at their desk, before
they get distracted, and most importantly, before your direct
competitor (who prospects probably emailed 20 seconds after they
emailed you) gets back to them first.

Very often the first company to respond gets the sale.

Which is why I’m bummed by survey results announced by Jupiter this
Monday that out of 227 US companies contacted via email, 23% didn’t
bother to respond within three days. Three days!

That kind of behavior hurts *all* of us, because it trains people
to not expect an answer when they email a company. Do we really
want to train our customers and prospects to not bother to contact
us via email? Do we really want to throw away sales?