Anne Holland

I just bought a car on eBay

March 13th, 2003

Recently I moved from the city to the seaside, so it was time at
the age of 40 to finally buy my first car.

I figured it would be easiest just to surf classifieds on the
Net. It was a horrible experience. Listings are left up on most
classified sites for the whole “term of the ad” even if the car’s
been long sold.

The dealer sites weren’t much better. Most car makers won’t let
you surf a data across all their dealers. You’ve got to click
in to each individual dealer and then click, click, click until
you see the list of available used cars. Many of which say,
“Call for price.”

Yeah, like I’m shopping online due to a strong desire to call a
car salesmen on the phone.

Frustrated and fed up, I finally called my sister-who-knows-
about-cars. “Did you look on eBay?” she said. Oh. Duh.

Which is how I found myself at 7:16 last night staring at my PC
screen while the final seconds of an auction for a cute ’96 VW
Golf ticked away. It was pulse pounding. It was seriously fun.
It was reasonably priced. It was safe due to services from
Escow.com and 1SourceAutoWarranty.com.

It was everything I’d ever been told used car buying is not.
Go eBay.

Oh, one last thing. Very cool item at Geico.com when I was
filling out the form to get an insurance quote for my new car.

They cleverly put a customer testimonial next to the submit
button on each page of the looong form. I’ll bet that reduces
form abandonment rates. Totally a stealable idea for online
merchants worried about their shopping cart abandonment rates.

Anne Holland

Must-Read If You License Content to ProQuest System

March 13th, 2003

Notes from my interview with Alacritude’s CEO Patrick Spain on the Windows Office 2003 content deal:

1. Factiva, Gale Group and Alacritude’s eLibrary are the 3 content providers to Office 2003’s new reference section.

2. Users will have to be plugged into the Net to be able to use the reference service because obviously all that content can’t sit in everybody’s PC.

3. When users decide to search on a term, they’ll click on a tab that will appear at the right side of their screen and highlight
the term in their text they want to search on. They’ll then see a list of headlines and “abstracts” from eLibrary. Spain’s hoping
they will be so enthralled with the content that some will pop for a $14.95 monthly or $79.95 annual subscription to access
entire articles.

4. Spain says his team have tested that price point extensively and it works the best for them. I was slightly surprised about
the $79.95 because many print subscription people have told me that “If you can get $70, you can get $90. There’s virtually no
difference in response.”

Spain added that he picked the .95 endings to prices because, “somebody who I respect said ‘don’t question it, don’t try and
research it, it works if everything ends in a 5.'” Which I completely respect.

5. So far eLibrary subscription buyers have been “pretty evenly split” between the month-to-month and annual subs, which is
unusual in the word of esubs where, if offered, annual almost always dominates monthlies. Spain says this is probably because
they are purely a reference product vs something relied on for new content through the year.

6. All the eLibrary content that will be available through Office 2003, is fed to eLibrary from ProQuest.

If you are a publisher who sells to Proquest (and thousands of print periodicals and newspapers do), and you fear that eLibrary’s $15/mo subscription offer might undercut your own online subscription offerings for more money for the same content, Spain suggests that you revisit your Proquest contract
and change the resale rights they have. Most contracts specify whether they can sell your content as an aggregated feed into library, education, business and consumer markets. eLibrary only carries the stuff that’s ok for resale to consumers.

7. Aside from offering subs to its own database of articles, eLibrary will also be offering its subscribers search capabilities across all the other sites they subscribe to. You can go to one eLibrary panel, input the sites you subscribe to and your password to those sites, and whenever you run a search,
results will show up from everything.

Which is handy for serious research hounds who don’t want to have to go to say WSJ.com and Economist.com and search separately for
the same topic.

Spain says to make this work, “we have to write a script based on the way each site operates.” They’ve done it for “several
hundred” subscription sites so far. They don’t want to do it for teeny sub sites that they’ll have very little call for articles
from, but if you want to make sure your site is on the list, contact VP Marketing Kathy Greenler at greenler@alacritude.com .

8. Aside from his high hopes for the Office 2003 deal, Spain says his best marketing campaign to drive new eLibrary subscribers so
far has been paid inclusion with search engines using inktomi’s service.

Anne Holland

Early Results on 3rd Party Content Site Google Ads

March 5th, 2003

Michael Herman of Christianity Today just sent in this data on his paid Google text ads using the new system where they are distributed against supposedly relevant content on content sites.

“Both of my Google AdWords accounts are getting a fair amount of impressions in the new third party program, but that’s about it.

My first account has had 73,550 impressions and only 462 click-throughs for a wimpy 0.63% click-through rate.

My second account is even worse. 90,159 impressions and only 242 click-throughs for a microscopic 0.26% click-through rate.

I’ll take the free clicks, but I don’t plan on participating in the program once they start charging. My regular accounts for those same keywords and campaigns are seeing 1.5% and 1.6% click-through rates.”

Why such a difference in performance? Well people using search engines are actively looking for links to click on. People on content sites may or may not be.

UPDATE: Ed Kohler of Haystack in a Needle wrote in, “I thought it might be worth clarifying that Google doesn’t use or plan to use the click through rates from syndicating when determining the CTR for competition, pricing, etc. So someone like Michael Herman shouldn’t consider click through rate when determining whether or not to syndicate. A better focus in on the quality of that traffic.” Good point.

BTW: If you’re interested, here are links to my Case Study on how Christianity Today makes money online as a free content site, and another Case Study on how its sister-site PreachingToday sells subscriptions.

1. http://library.marketingsherpa.com/barrier.cfm?CID=1490

2. http://library.marketingsherpa.com/barrier.cfm?CID=1491

http://www.HaystackInANeedle.com

Anne Holland

20 Mill Pageviews/Mo. Required to Carry Google Ads

March 4th, 2003

Per my Blog last week about Google selling text ads to be placed contextually on 3rd party content sites (vs. other search engines), they have at last officially posted the info on this new program.

To qualify you must have at least 20 million pageviews a month, which leaves just about every niche site on the Web out of the picture. It makes sense from an implementation perspective; doing deals with a zillion little sites would be a royal admin pain. The fact is Google already sells to a zillion little advertisers who buy through its automated system, so I guess I expected the brand to serve their small publisher counterparts on the other side.

Silly me.

http://www.google.com/services/ct.html

Anne Holland

Saddam Hussein Owns 2% of Hachette Filipacchi's Parent

March 3rd, 2003

Adam Cohen of Media Professional Newsletter, spotted a New York Post story (link no longer good; sorry) that reveals Saddam Hussein owns 2% of Hachette Filipacchi’s parent company Lagardere SCA. His stake is worth about $90 million. In the US Hachette publishes Elle, Car & Driver,and Women’s Day. Lagardere claim to be stuck with it because they say any transactions are frozen under legal sanctions. They’ve known about this since 1990 and haven’t managed to wiggle out of it yet.

Anne Holland

Using a Q&A Blog to Get Consulting Clients

March 3rd, 2003

Clever new content-> Commerce site out from online marketing consultant John Lawlor. BlogAnswerMan is created in Blog format with each entry answering a visitor’s question about how they can market their business with a Blog. The form to collect questions is on the home page, as well as a phone number to call for personal for-fee consulting on the topic. If your question is answered in the Blog you get that answer gratis. If it’s not chosen for public consumption, Lawlor tries to convert you into a paying consulting client.

To encourage people to give their real names (instead of Mickey Mouse) when filling out the question form, Lawlor presents the opportunity to get your name on the published question as a benefit, which appeals to visitor’s egos.

He doesn’t have enough data back yet to learn if it will be a good business model, but he’s happy to report that his search engine rankings are incredibly good “I went from zero to top 10 on Google in less than 72-hours. By Sunday evening I was in top ten positions on my targeted keywords on Google, MSN, AOL and Overture.” The terms his Blog is optimized for include: b-blog, “blog consultant,” blog consultant, “business blog,” business blog, and business-blog.

As I’ve mentioned before, Blogs are a great way to get high rankings quickly if you copywrite them using search terms. Normal sites can take up to 30 days or more to get noticed, but for reasons I don’t understand (but no doubt many of you do) Blogs tend to get picked up more quickly and more easily.

http://bloganswerman.com

Anne Holland

Cool idea – add text ads to your site search

February 27th, 2003

“Are we done with the interview now? Got five minutes?” asked
Seth Brenzel at Atomz after we chatted for my new Case Study on
his marketing. “Let me show you something.”

It was *so* cool.

Seth’s testing adding his own relevant text-ads at the top of his
own site’s search results. It’s like taking the paid listings
you’re putting on outside search engines such as Google, and
putting them on your own site’s search function too.

Three data points make me suspect this will be a successful test:

#1. A certain segment of the Net population invariably use sites’
search functions to navigate. They don’t use your nav bar or
your lovely merchandise graphics. They skip that stuff and go
straight for your search box. If the results don’t please them,
they bail on your site.

#2. Most sites’ search results alone aren’t all that great. It’s
like the marketer assumed everyone would use regular navigation
and search is an afterthought. The chances visitors will find
useful results can be slim.

#3. About 22% of all clicks generated from search results on
Google and Yahoo are from searches clicking on paid text
listings. That means almost one out of every four searchers is
happier to click on the sponsored link instead of the actual
search results.

Put those three facts together and you’ve got a strong case for
sticking little text-listings in your own site’s search results.
I know we’ll be testing it in a few weeks ourselves.

P.S. Link to Case Study on Seth’s lead gen marketing:
http://library.marketingsherpa.com/barrier.cfm?ContentID=2276

Anne Holland

Cool idea: Add text ads to your site search

February 27th, 2003

“Are we done with the interview now? Got five minutes?” asked
Seth Brenzel at Atomz after we chatted for my new Case Study on
his marketing. “Let me show you something.”

It was *so* cool.

Seth’s testing adding his own relevant text-ads at the top of his
own site’s search results. It’s like taking the paid listings
you’re putting on outside search engines such as Google, and
putting them on your own site’s search function too.

Three data points make me suspect this will be a successful test:

#1. A certain segment of the Net population invariably use sites’
search functions to navigate. They don’t use your nav bar or
your lovely merchandise graphics. They skip that stuff and go
straight for your search box. If the results don’t please them,
they bail on your site.

#2. Most sites’ search results alone aren’t all that great. It’s
like the marketer assumed everyone would use regular navigation
and search is an afterthought. The chances visitors will find
useful results can be slim.

#3. About 22% of all clicks generated from search results on
Google and Yahoo are from searches clicking on paid text
listings. That means almost one out of every four searchers is
happier to click on the sponsored link instead of the actual
search results.

Put those three facts together and you’ve got a strong case for
sticking little text-listings in your own site’s search results.
I know we’ll be testing it in a few weeks ourselves.

P.S. Link to Case Study on Seth’s lead gen marketing:
http://library.marketingsherpa.com/barrier.cfm?ContentID=2276

Anne Holland

eSub Sellers – Having Trouble with CC Processing?

February 24th, 2003

Online subscription sellers: Are you having any trouble with your bounce rates, handling expired cards, or Visa’s new regs on month-to-month charges?

I’ve been hearing murmurs from several (very) well known sites, so I’ve hired a writer who specializes in covering the credit card industry to do a special article on this stuff for ContentBiz. If you want to contribute info or questions, you can reach him directly at PNastu@msn.com.

Please be sure to let him know if you want to be quoted or anonymous. Thanks.

Anne Holland

Rant #1: Syndication & Ad Sales – It's About Service

February 24th, 2003

I’ve seen an upsurge in syndication deals and syndication-sales-hopes recently. Two examples: Financial Content who I first wrote
about two years ago have gone from selling a few clients $200 per month feeds to selling lots of clients $1500 per month feeds;
while Edmunds.com started powering the New York Times auto pages last week. http://www.nytimes.com/autos/

Yes there is a little more money these days, and far fewer players scrambling for their slice of the pie. I suspect the true reason for some sites’ success is service. You’re not in the content industry, you’re in the service industry. The easier you can make it to buy content from you, the more you’ll sell licenses.

In the case of my two examples, Financial Content’s site’s testimonials all focus on that service aspect. “Your team was
always accessible, helpful and willing to do what it takes to get the job done.” writes one client. “Implementation has been remarkably seamless and smooth,” says another.
http://www.financialcontent.com/web/clients.shtml

This Monday Edmunds.com launched a major site revamp with the specific goal of “offering unsurpassed flexibility and
modularity for efficient syndication.”

On a side note, last Friday night I was chatting with Seana Mulcahy VP, Director of Interactive Media Mullen whose team buys
hundreds of millions of dollars in online ads each year.
http://www.mullen.com

“Online publishers make it impossible to buy from them!” she ranted. She’s one of many media buyers who are increasingly frustrated with the lack of standards so art departments have to resize and redo ads constantly for each different site (the cost of which really adds up) and how hard it is to make an integrated ad buy across all of a single media company’s channels without negotiating and cutting multiple insertion orders.

Online advertising is to some degree also a service business. Being easier to buy from than your competitor may be a highly
significant advantage. It’s not content + eyeballs = profits. It’s content + friendly service = profits.