Archive

Archive for 2004

How Google's Gmail May Affect Emailers (Hint: Bad News)

May 20th, 2004

During my speech on “5 Biggest Challenges for Online Sub Marketers” at our Summit in NYC last week, I told everyone to worry about Google’s Gmail.

Why?

Because Google is going to insert paid third-party ads into incoming mail for users. Which makes sense — it pays the bills for that hefty one gig of mailbox-space Google will offer to lure users from Hotmail, Yahoo, etc.

If you’re a marketer or publisher sending mail, this means Google’s going to stick ads on the campaigns and newsletters you send. It may distract from your message, and certainly could hurt your click rates because more options spit clicks.

Plus — this is the scary part — an ad from your direct competitor could be displayed beside your email to your list.

Google probably won’t allow marketers to target email ads by sender or recipient, but they probably will allow ad buyers to target by keyword/key term. And, no they’re not protecting trademark now for search ads, so there’s no reason to assume they’ll protect it in email.

To sum up: your competitors may be able to put ads inside of all emailed messages Gmail users get that contain your company or brand name.

Our MarketingSherpa Editor called me today with a tiny bit of silver lining to help emailers cope with the Gmail cloud.

Turns out that other email services – including Yahoo and Terra Lycos – are starting to take a competitive stance against Google’s incursion by making their mailbox sizes bigger too. This is a complete reversal of the trend of the past two years with boxes becoming so tiny that loads of email bounced.

So, your bounce rates to live active accounts will probably be lower, especially over holiday and vacation-times when folks don’t clean out boxes as often.

Of course your message or offer has to be ultra-compelling to make it past fast-delete when they get back to their computers. But, you already knew that.

Useful link — Janet has posted a screenshot of what an incoming message looks like in Gmail for you. She asked me to note that since Gmail is in beta, the format may change considerably when Google actually rolls it out:
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/images/gmail.jpg

P.S. Here’s a free link to my wrap-up summary of the Subscription Summit as well:
http://www.contentbiz.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2709

Show Notes: Search Engine Strategies, Toronto May 2004 — 7 Hottest Topics

May 13th, 2004

Publisher’s note: Andrew dashed off these notes as an internal memo for us. I thought you might enjoy them too.

The conference had a strong turnout and there was good energy. I found the content enlightening, both for what was being said and what was not being said ….

Search engines were typically reticent about fielding specific questions that they felt divulged too much information about their technologies, while the web designers, SEO’s, and marketers picked and prodded for answers to why their site was “blacklisted” or is not showing up properly on a organic search or why some link farms are detected while others are not. (This interaction was very entertaining.)

Fox in the hen house award went to Eric Ward. He was part of the “Link Building” session which included Google and Ask Jeeves. He essentially said not to really consider the ramifications of links on your search engine results because they often don’t find all the links on your site any way and that some of the most valued links are not tracked by the search engines. He was a breath of fresh air.

Other than that, the seven hot topics at the conference were:

#1 Click-fraud

This was the Large white elephant that was consistently walking around each room. A few people brought it up but no one really stayed on the topic. No one really wants to talk about it, but everyone knows it is an issue. Tuesday morning there was some buzz about the article in the “India Times” about companies that are hired in India to find specific keywords and click on them. This issue seems to be something that needs to be better addressed and considering the importance of this topic it seemed to be an overt omission that there were no sessions devoted to this topic.

#2 Local Search

– This is clearly going to be an area that is going to grow in the very near future. It seemed that Google is a bit behind in Local search and that there are search competitors who may have a bit better of a handle on it than they do. The technology for local search seemed to be falling short of the marketer demand…I anticipate some serious advances by search engines in the field of Local search.

Many local marketers were complaining to the Search Engines that they generate strong content about a local markets and their sites are being pushed well down the organic search listing by the Content Aggregators like Expedia, Hotels.com, and Travelocity which may just have better overall traffic. These aggregators may have better traffic numbers, but they are not the authorities regarding local markets.

#3 Greater Description of Keyword

– As I had mentioned in the IT Marketing Metrics Guidebook, the greater the number of words in a search, the more specific the end-user is in their search which is commensurate to higher conversion rates. The more words in a keyword search, the greater the conversion rate. In addition, it is generally less expensive to purchase 3,4 and 5 word keyword searches that 1-2 word searches. So not only is it better at conversion, it is cheaper to buy. Don’t expect this to remain true for too much longer—the genie is out of the bottle. Buy them while you can.

#4 Dayparts (aka Dayparting)

Google and others talked about the importance of looking at dayparts, both in measuring comparative usage between online and TV and how dayparts affect interest and intent. I think I heard the word “Dayparting” come out of about 5 different speakers mouths, (they said “Dayparting” and not “Daypart” because of the web’s insistence to think they are inventing something that has been around traditional media for the last 100 years). There is definitely something relevant to purchasing specific daypart that we may see coming up in the near future. Google seemed to be positioning themselves to look at this as a viable purchasing method.

#5 Rise of the web analytics tools

Out of the maturation of the search marketing category is the honing of Web Analytics tools. Finally, there is a business model online that is a foundation for data and research to base their software and tools around.

The metrics are clear. (Particularly BtoC — BtoB is a bit more in the dark that’s what my book is for.) Clickthrough, conversions, Average Revenue per purchase, ROI of purchasing… These are very concrete tracking metrics and the new tools that have been created for both search and website conversion tracking are proving to be extremely helpful.

#6 More personalized search

In the same vein of local search, customized search was a big topic for marketers who don’t feel that their brands are being as well represented in queries that are really looking for their specific content. They all understand the parameters in paid search, but when it comes to organic, they feel like the larger aggregators are able to monopolize the listings and think it is in part due to the traffic on these sites.

While Yahoo was showing their “Shortcuts” (ability to just type in “Weather in Boston” and get a full weather report or “Yankee Scores” and get a score and schedule listing) this was again more of a topic being talked about by the marketers than implemented by the search engines. MSN was not at the conference and some think that they may be in development of a highly customized search interface that allows the user to really fine tune their search queries.

#7 Dynamic Pages are terrible for search engines

If at all possible, avoid dynamic URLs (I’m sure you know this already). These pages are very confusing to spiders and webcrawlers and are generally ignored. If you really want a page listed on an organic search engine, do not use a dynamic URL use a static html page.

Useful link related to these notes:

Search Engine Watch (organizers behind the conference)
http://searchenginewatch.com

Three New Inspirational Out-of-Home Ads (Show Your Creative Director)

May 6th, 2004

I got stuck in traffic yesterday morning while driving over to sign the lease for our new offices. This is Rhode Island, so although I was on a main route, there was only one lane each way. Which meant I became darned familiar with the Muzak van directly in front of me.

The Muzak logo was painted on its rear along with some branding copy. I got a smile from thinking about this stressed-out van driver struggling to bring soothing music to the rest of us. Then I thought about how cool the logo was, compared to my mental image of the company… and so on. Muzak certainly got their money’s worth from that out-of-home ad.

Here are three more fun out-of-home campaigns I’ve heard about recently — along with creative samples (link below) that will make you smile too:

#1. Bobblehead billboard

Ignite Media, a Vancouver-area auto deadlership’s ad agency, glued more than 700 different bobbleheads to a billboard, hoping for the “Holy cow” factor. They’re measuring results by conducting phone surveys. And, they’ve already started a massive collection of dinky cars for the next rendition.

#2. StadiumTRAY

Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort is putting its message literally into the laps of sports enthusiasts. They’ve printed a 4-color ad onto the cardboard trays that concession stands hand out at Philadelphia’s Wachovia Complex. The art is fairly cleverly designed to work with the shape of the tray.

#3. Bigger, better (measureable) truck-side ads

Bic pens as well as several TV and radio shows are running ads that completely take over the sides of large trucks. Unlike truckside promos that are painted — which can limit your creativity — these are printed on a giant sheet of plastic which is then affixed to the side of the truck for as long as you want your campaign to run.

It’s got much more impact, plus you can run a campaign for a more limited time. And, we love this, the vendor offering the service uses GPS to track your trucks, and ultimately measure brand impact on the particular demographic you wanted to influence.

Here’s a link to a Web page where we’ve posted creative samples of all three campaigns:
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/coolads/ad.html

Personalize Landing Pages (Easily) for Higher Conversions

May 3rd, 2004

Here’s an idea that I think any site big or small could use to improve sales or lead generation…

While surfing last night I typed “www.ilovebetty.com” on a whim to see if anything would come up. (Betty is my dog.) By golly up came a Web site with that exact name!

In fact it was a clever tactic from the folks at loveletters.com who’ve apparently bought the “ilove” URLs for loads of names, and redirect them to the main loveletters.com site. However, their system cleverly inserts the specific name you were typing. So I saw a page with the headline “I Love Betty.” Which, naturally warmed the cockles of my heart.

You don’t need to own a bunch of URLs to personalize a page new visitors see this way. In fact, you can use your Web analytics and/or affiliate marketing system to note what URL visitors are coming from, and then jerryrig your content management system to automatically display related content. Three examples:

— Paid search clicks convert far better if they see their exact search term included in the wording of headline on your landing page. This can be automated so it’s not much work for you, no matter how many hundreds of search terms you have ads under. (See the link directly below for a Case Study I did on a b2b marketer who tested this.)

— Affiliate and marketing partner clicks are more likely to buy if they see a little note at the top of their landing page that references where they saw the offer. I invented a “pink sticky note” for our own store we use this way. (Link below to sample.)

If you arrive via an affiliate link in our store, and we’ve activated the note, you’ll see a note that says something like, “Welcome MarketingVox Readers!” or “As seen in Advertising Age…”

If the affiliate is a guru who the clicker is likely to respect, we may even have that person write a more personal-sounding review or recommendation to post there.

— You can also use extensions of your regular URL to send visitors to highly personalized pages. For example, a division of Hewlett-Packard sent personalized postcards to the best prospects on its list directing them to a Web page with their name in the URL (not-real-example: www.hp.com/bettyholland).

Their site’s content management system automatically stuck that name in the headline and copy so the visitor felt like a site was built just for them. Conversions were outstanding. (See link to our Case Study directly below.)

Please let me know if you’ve tested an idea like any of these, and if I can report on it. In the meantime, here are the links I promised:

— Case Study: Targeting Landing Pages by Keyword Improves Paid Search Conversion Rates Dramatically
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2526

— Case Study: HP Tests Personalized Web Landing Pages for Email and Direct Mail Campaigns — Data & Samples
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/barrier.cfm?currentID=2457

— A sample of our “pinky sticky notes” in action:
http://sherpastore.com/store/page.cfm/2146?a=weekly

— I Love Betty (and if you knew her, you would too.)
http://www.ilovebetty.com

New Data: 40% of consumers zap cookies weekly — popular sites' monthly uniques may be inflated

April 22nd, 2004

If you’re an online ad media buyer, an e-retailer concerned with conversion data, or anyone else who analyzes site stats for a living, unique visitor counts are a critical metric.

However, various adware-zapping programs are putting your stats in danger.

Greg Harmon of Belden Associates who’s run readership surveys for more than 40 US newspaper sites told me he began to wonder why nearly every single site’s log files only showed three average visits per user per month when, according to nearly 70,000 survey answers, on average readers visit a particular newspaper site 24 times per month.

If true, the discrepancy meant only 20% of the uniques the log files reported were actually uniques. The rest were repeat visitors who mysteriously appeared to be newbies.

People switching between work and home computers accounted for about 25% of the discrepancy … not enough to be the main answer.

So, 60 days ago Greg decided to add two questions to surveys he was running for three newspapers — one in Virginia, one in Illinois and one in California. Figuring that adware-stopper downloads are now probably in the hundreds of millions, He asked survey takers how often they cleared their cookies.

Of 3,500 answers, about 40% said they cleared cookies at least once a week. And, these weren’t geeks. The median age was 40, and 2/3 were women.

Greg is putting together a PDF with some initial data on this. It will be ready Monday, and he told me you can get it by emailing him at gharmon@beldenassociates.com

I also called up David Barlin over at I/PRO who conduct site traffic audits. He told me he agrees, you should never rely on site log counts to determine true uniques, especially if you’re a media buyer fretting about reach and frequency. I/PRO has developed an algorithm to run against reported site stats to determine true traffic. Interesting…

So, annoyingly, the world’s most measurable advertising medium is now, thanks to increased cookie-wiping, harder to measure remotely accurately.

Useful links related to this Blog:

Interesting article in Editor & Publisher on Belden’s data:
http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/columns/newspaper_2point0_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000492257

I/PRO & BPA Int’l info on the new Agencies for Interactive Audits program:
http://www.ipro.com/pdf/agencies_launch.pdf

Belden Associates
http://www.beldenassociates.com

Permanent link to this Blog column on our site:
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2678

Eyeblaster Introduces Smellblaster – Online Ads That Smell

April 1st, 2004

At last a true use for dayparting! Eyeblaster, the leading rich media ad format, announced today the launch of Smellblaster (TM).

“Imagine – you’re surfing the Net late at night, when suddenly an ad for pizza floats across your screen, and you can actually smell the melted cheese and pepperoni,” says Eyeblaster Marketing Director Masha Geller.

“Eyeblaster has gained respect and trust through constant refinement of our Rich Media Platform and a commitment to serving client needs,” says CEO Gal Trifon. “Smellblaster is the obvious next step for rich media, and extension of that commitment.”

Could Smellblaster be the online ad format that finally pries significant consumer packaged goods and prepared foods ad budgets away from television?

Controlled effectiveness marketing tests conducted over the past 30 days in conjunction with Dynamic Logic and the Neilsen Norman Usability Labs, indicate the Smellblaster format offers a median 32% lift in brand favorability and 29% lift in purchase intent.

To make initial tests easier for creative teams and less expensive for clients, the Eyeblaster platform will contain a selection of preconfigured smells that can be served into any ad format. Paul Kadin, Eyeblaster EVP Marketing & Strategy, also offers this advice to ad creatives, “You don’t want your ad to stink.”

Initial sites offering the Smellblaster format include Yahoo, a long-time innovator known for running the first homepage takeover ad in 2001, and New York Times Digital, who are like Mikey, they’ll try anything. Recipes.com, ESPN, ReeferMadness.org, and iVillage have all also expressed interest.

In addition, several e-retailers are launching tests in the next quarter, including 1-800-FLOWERS, Godiva.com, and Wilson’s Leather.

Last but not least, Dreamland.com, a site dedicated to filmmaker John Waters, will use Smellblaster technology to power its email newsletter.

Ofer Zadikario, Eyeblaster Co-Founder and VP Research & Development, says, “This experience is best in a broadband environment, however we are testing a new lingering smell format that would be equally effective for dial-up users.”

Smellblaster – it’s only a matter of time.

NOTE: MarketingSherpa would like to thank the folks at Eyeblaster for being such good sports about this April Fools article.

Almost six months since my last post…

March 29th, 2004

Almost six months since my last post… and here’s what I’ve learned:

a) As the economy improves your publishing company will take off at long last in terms of revenues (vs just poor but friendly fans.)

b) You’ll have worked yourself to the bone in the meantime, so you eagerly begin to look for editorial hires with the increased revenues.

c) Since you’re about to hire someone who can take over your blog (after almost four years of postings you’d like to take a break), you figure, hey take a break and the new guy/gal can pick it up shortly.

d) You find out how incredibly hard it is to hire someone, well, blog-worthy who’s passionate about the topic, and has enough biz background and time to do a good job. But you keep hoping, researching, headhunting….

e) Six months go by. And you’ve become one of those annoying Bloggers — someone who started out all full of posts but then let the thing languish by the wayside.

f) And now it’s almost embarassing to start again. You feel so lame you sort of want to hide. Plus, if you do start over and the perfect hire takes ages more to present himself/herself, what if you get all tired and swept-up in other stuff again; and then stop blogging all over and lose any remaining shards of trust with your readers??

So, that’s where I am. I do have one possible excellent hire for this in sight. But it could take a couple of months before she’s ready and able to take this on. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Must-read Research Results on Search & Online Shopping

March 25th, 2004

Wow – I just spent the past 45 minutes blowing off email and phone calls to read a brand new report on the results of a focus group Enquiro Search Solutions conducted last month.

Although it focused on consumers, the data is highly relevant for b-to-b marketers as well. Some highlights:

– Landing pages and sites loaded with informational non-salesy materials such as specs, product photos, research, guides, reviews, etc., were much more likely to convert than overt sales messages.

– Aside from one demographic (mostly young men) who want to get shopping over with as quickly as possible, most searchers are extremely circuitous. They search multiple terms, click on multiple links, veer from retailer to review site to manufacturer and back again.

So, if you rely on simple measurement of view/click/convert to judge performance you are significantly underestimating your search campaign performance.

– If a brand comes up in a high organic position early in the process, it may result in a sale much later in the process, even if the searcher never clicks on that initial link. Search success is much more about building brand awareness than most of us guessed.

– Almost 80% of searchers skip over sponsored listings initially or entirely (especially Google users); only 21% will click to a second page of listings if they can’t find what they want on the first; and if a review site such as ConsumerReports.org shows up in the top organic listings it’s almost “guaranteed a 50% plus clickthrough.” Which means if your listing is nearby, you’re close to invisible in the glare of the review site’s glory.

– People won’t cross over the “anonymity threshold” to give your site any information about themselves until they have absolutely no option and are ready to engage in a significant relationship with your site (such as purchasing or signing up as a sales prospect with the intention of putting your brand on a short-list.)

Combine that fact with the data that 72% of searches are conducted with the mindset of researching prior to making an engagement decision, and there’s a problem with using search for direct response goals alone.

The vast majority of searchers hitting your landing page (or site) are not in a response mindset – are, indeed, highly resistant to the idea. It’s the old asking someone to marry you on the first date dilemma.

So, how can your landing page still convert the 28% who are ready, while gaining mindshare and future purchases from the 72% who are not? Plus, how do you measure the latter’s success?

That’s the dilemma we all face.

Anyway, enough of me babbling on and on. You can check out the research results for yourself. The 30-page PDF is complimentary, but there’s required registration (oh the irony):
http://www.enquiro.com/Downloads/

Marketing Experiment Diary Part II: Responses Flood In

March 18th, 2004

Since we launched our new experimental service – Marketer’s Desktop Resource Center – a week ago today, more than 500 of you have downloaded it. And everybody’s been emailing me with feedback like crazy. (Thanks.)

Here are the newest lessons I’ve learned from the whole thing:

Lesson #1. Offer RSS as an alternative

The vast majority of you wanted to know, “Is this RSS? If it’s not, why don’t you offer RSS?” Well, it’s not RSS. It’s a downloadable application like Weatherbug only it’s completely dedicated to MarketingSherpa content.

RSS doesn’t allow us to give you a useful toolbar, permanent links, or graphics (I have big plans). All users get is the story headline with a link. Plus you can’t measure RSS (easily at least), and we estimate fewer than 500,000 people have RSS readers installed. (Compared to tens of millions using downloads like ours.)

But, obviously many of those 500,000 are our readers. So Holly Hicks in our production department is working on starting an RSS feed for you in the next week. I’ll include a link in my Blog when it comes out.

Lesson #2. Corporate IT departments are cracking down

A bunch of marketers working for large companies wrote in that they had to ask their IT department’s permission before downloading anything.

The IT guy doesn’t know our brand name or trust us when we promise not to send pop-ads, or banners, or spy on users, or suck up their bandwidth unnecessarily. So, now we need to add extra tech facts to our FAQ on the download page to help user wanna-bes overcome their IT department’s suspicions.

Lesson #3. Twice daily pings are too many!

While everyone liked getting updates automatically, just as twice daily email would be too frequent, twice-daily “pings” were annoying.

The problem is we have new stories about twice a day, and I don’t want folks to complain because they missed something. So, now we’re working with Arcavista (our tech provider) to create a preferences form where users can say, “Only ping me when you have a story on a topic I’m particularly interested in.”

The update will take a few weeks (you know what tech dev is like), and in the meantime, I’m mulling over ping frequency fixes.

Lesson #4. Make it big enough to clearly read

I told the designers to make our application about as big as Weatherbug because I like the size and it’s got that cool “gizmo” factor. I was wrong.

Enough of you wrote in to say that you find the small size harder to read, that for our next update the designers will go bigger. Live and learn.

Useful links related to this Blog:

-> Part I of this Experiment Diary explaining how we came up with the new service in reaction to filter frustration, and 4 lessons I learned while developing it:
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2630

-> Web page where you can see a picture of the service and decide if you want to get your own complimentary copy:
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/desktop.html

MarketingSherpa Experiment Diary: Can a New Desktop Application Replace Email Newsletters?

March 11th, 2004

Last Thursday, Thomas Korte, International Product Marketing Manager over at Google, emailed me, “I just wanted to let you know that your newsletter has recently started to be classified as spam 🙁 when it is sent to my work email.”

Arrgh! Despite the fact that we’ve been researching how to get permission email past filters for two years now, I get notes like this all too frequently.

The problem is at-work email accounts. Corporate IT departments are so desperate to stem the spam influx that they hurl every filter they can at it — including content-based filters that are infamous for high “false positive” rates. And since we use words in our stories like “advertising,” “online marketing,” and “opt-in” these filters sometimes stop our issues.

We’ve leapt through all the hoops to get as much email through as possible, including getting our own dedicated IP address, sending story-summaries instead of full-stories (fewer total words means less stuff you can be filtered for), and switching consistently non-opening subscribers to text-only.

It worked – our open rates now run 55-67% depending on subject line. But I wasn’t satisfied.

So when Matthew DeGanon at Arcavista asked if I’d like to try offering a desktop application, powered by his tech, that sends content directly to readers’ PCs without going through email, I was very excited about the experiment.

I’m a big huge fan of Weatherbug – a desktop application more than 13 million people have downloaded to get weather news without having to go to email or a Web site. It’s fun, it’s cute, it’s useful, and it’s free. Hey, I thought, how cool would it be to launch a “SherpaBug”?

Well, it’s launching today. You can see for yourself:
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/desktop.html

And, here are four lessons I learned along the way:

Lesson #1. Set Goals Prior to Development

I’m horribly easily swept into doing projects because it will be really fun and cool. And then later I kick myself in the pants and say, “Was there an ROI worth mentioning?”

Example: We invested in creating a “Torture-a-Spammer” online game 18 months ago. The rationalization was that it would be a great viral marketing tool. Hundreds of thousands played it, but only 5% signed up as newsletter subscribers and they had a rotten, dreadful conversion rate to becoming MarketingSherpaStore customers. The experience was fun, but a waste of money.

Unmitigated creativity is not the path to business success. Setting goals and measuring results is.

So, I set a few worst case scenario assumptions in place prior to saying yes to the Arcavista project, including:

o If 1% of current readers download the application and keep it on their desktop for at least a year;

o and, these readers spend an average of $1 more per year than the average newsletter reader spends in our online store, presumably because they’ll see and click on more of our content than newsletter readers;

o and, production time cost to update and maintain the application with our articles would be lower than this extra $1 more per year per user we made;

o will this at least cover costs?

OK, this reasoning is a bit flawed because the people most likely to download a MarketingSherpa desktop application are probably also likely to be among our biggest fans, and thus more likely than most to spend more money anyway.

If I had a perfect customer database backend I’d be able to account for that. We’re still building it, but if you have one and you’re trying a similar experiment, be sure to include that factor in your calculations. (And then let me know your results.)

Lesson #2. Design will be hell

Think about the first Web site you were ever allowed to direct the design on. You wanted to go wild — and probably a lot of the ideas you had were dreadful from a usability standpoint.

(My first professional site in 1996 had round icons swooping about the page instead of a traditional navigation bar or readable text. Looked fabulous, but it was miserable to get around on.)

Although I yearned to take the format for a test-drive and get really creative, I knew unmitigated creativity does not a successful design make. Arcavista’s design team had some ideas, but let’s face it, these guys are not in my target audience or familiar with my brand. Their ideas looked like a military videogame suitable for male 20-somethings.

My Web designer had some ideas, but let’s face it, he’s a Web designer. His idea looked just like a little square Web page. Anybody downloading that would think, “and the point would be?”

I had some ideas, but let’s face it, I’m in love with MarketingSherpa so my idea was to overwhelm the poor user with 20 buttons to different parts of the site. It was nothing more than a giant, scary-long navigation bar.

After two months of dithering, I printed out a copy of everyone’s mock-ups and cut and pasted a new version together (yes, with scissors and tape) using the best bits of each.

I liked the way the Arvcavista guys made theirs look like a gizmo instead of a flat screen. I loved the colors from my Web designer. And a tiny handful of my buttons got tossed in as well.

It looks OK, but not as incredible as my first feverish dreams. But hey, we have years to evolve in. Plus, as more folks launch desktop applications, there will be more places for me to steal design ideas from.

Lesson #3. You can’t update apps as easily as email (or sites)

Once we settled on the final design, Arcavista made me sign a letter saying in effect, “This is the final design for version 1.0.” I thought they were a little admin-happy but whatever.

Whups.

When I called up a few days later to ask, “Hey, can we tweak that yellow a bit?” my account rep had to say, “Sorry, not unless you want to delay launch for a week.” I said, “Why? What’s the big deal? It’s a two-second tweak.”

Turns out something, that might be a two-second tweak for your Web site, is a much bigger deal for your desktop application. The guys have to make the change, then test it in the lab to make sure no other code got broken, then update the version… it all takes more time.

So, if you’re considering an application, you can’t make sudden, swift changes to your format creative even though it’s super easy to update the content inside the format. (We’re planning to do it about seven times per week.)

Lesson #4. Copywriting will be hell

Finally we were ready to launch. So I had to write the copy for the landing page to describe this wonderful new thing. Great. How?

If you say, “desktop application” many of us creative types shudder away. It’s a techy term that doesn’t sound remotely enticing. Neither does “bug”. Neither does “peer-to-peer device” which is what one friend suggested. And “spyware” is out of the question (especially since we’re not watching anything besides normal email stuff — how many users we get and then if any of the clicks turn into sales).

I ended up writing so much descriptive copy in an effort to explain what exactly this thing is, that the first landing page was frighteningly long. Nobody was going to read all that.

In the end, I cut and cut and danced around the issue entirely.

Because desktop applications are relatively new, there isn’t a term you can use like “Web site” that everyone will know what that is. You just have to describe the benefits and say “Free” and “New” and cross your fingers.

You can see the copy I wound up with on the info page. The good news is, it’s a Web page, so if the copy doesn’t work we can change it nearly instantly….

Let me know what you think — aholland@marketingSherpa.com

And thanks for your support.

http://www.marketingsherpa.com/desktop.html
http://www.arcavista.com