Archive

Author Archive

New Data: 40% of consumers zap cookies weekly — popular sites' monthly uniques may be inflated

April 22nd, 2004

If you’re an online ad media buyer, an e-retailer concerned with conversion data, or anyone else who analyzes site stats for a living, unique visitor counts are a critical metric.

However, various adware-zapping programs are putting your stats in danger.

Greg Harmon of Belden Associates who’s run readership surveys for more than 40 US newspaper sites told me he began to wonder why nearly every single site’s log files only showed three average visits per user per month when, according to nearly 70,000 survey answers, on average readers visit a particular newspaper site 24 times per month.

If true, the discrepancy meant only 20% of the uniques the log files reported were actually uniques. The rest were repeat visitors who mysteriously appeared to be newbies.

People switching between work and home computers accounted for about 25% of the discrepancy … not enough to be the main answer.

So, 60 days ago Greg decided to add two questions to surveys he was running for three newspapers — one in Virginia, one in Illinois and one in California. Figuring that adware-stopper downloads are now probably in the hundreds of millions, He asked survey takers how often they cleared their cookies.

Of 3,500 answers, about 40% said they cleared cookies at least once a week. And, these weren’t geeks. The median age was 40, and 2/3 were women.

Greg is putting together a PDF with some initial data on this. It will be ready Monday, and he told me you can get it by emailing him at gharmon@beldenassociates.com

I also called up David Barlin over at I/PRO who conduct site traffic audits. He told me he agrees, you should never rely on site log counts to determine true uniques, especially if you’re a media buyer fretting about reach and frequency. I/PRO has developed an algorithm to run against reported site stats to determine true traffic. Interesting…

So, annoyingly, the world’s most measurable advertising medium is now, thanks to increased cookie-wiping, harder to measure remotely accurately.

Useful links related to this Blog:

Interesting article in Editor & Publisher on Belden’s data:
http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/columns/newspaper_2point0_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000492257

I/PRO & BPA Int’l info on the new Agencies for Interactive Audits program:
http://www.ipro.com/pdf/agencies_launch.pdf

Belden Associates
http://www.beldenassociates.com

Permanent link to this Blog column on our site:
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2678

Eyeblaster Introduces Smellblaster – Online Ads That Smell

April 1st, 2004

At last a true use for dayparting! Eyeblaster, the leading rich media ad format, announced today the launch of Smellblaster (TM).

“Imagine – you’re surfing the Net late at night, when suddenly an ad for pizza floats across your screen, and you can actually smell the melted cheese and pepperoni,” says Eyeblaster Marketing Director Masha Geller.

“Eyeblaster has gained respect and trust through constant refinement of our Rich Media Platform and a commitment to serving client needs,” says CEO Gal Trifon. “Smellblaster is the obvious next step for rich media, and extension of that commitment.”

Could Smellblaster be the online ad format that finally pries significant consumer packaged goods and prepared foods ad budgets away from television?

Controlled effectiveness marketing tests conducted over the past 30 days in conjunction with Dynamic Logic and the Neilsen Norman Usability Labs, indicate the Smellblaster format offers a median 32% lift in brand favorability and 29% lift in purchase intent.

To make initial tests easier for creative teams and less expensive for clients, the Eyeblaster platform will contain a selection of preconfigured smells that can be served into any ad format. Paul Kadin, Eyeblaster EVP Marketing & Strategy, also offers this advice to ad creatives, “You don’t want your ad to stink.”

Initial sites offering the Smellblaster format include Yahoo, a long-time innovator known for running the first homepage takeover ad in 2001, and New York Times Digital, who are like Mikey, they’ll try anything. Recipes.com, ESPN, ReeferMadness.org, and iVillage have all also expressed interest.

In addition, several e-retailers are launching tests in the next quarter, including 1-800-FLOWERS, Godiva.com, and Wilson’s Leather.

Last but not least, Dreamland.com, a site dedicated to filmmaker John Waters, will use Smellblaster technology to power its email newsletter.

Ofer Zadikario, Eyeblaster Co-Founder and VP Research & Development, says, “This experience is best in a broadband environment, however we are testing a new lingering smell format that would be equally effective for dial-up users.”

Smellblaster – it’s only a matter of time.

NOTE: MarketingSherpa would like to thank the folks at Eyeblaster for being such good sports about this April Fools article.

Almost six months since my last post…

March 29th, 2004

Almost six months since my last post… and here’s what I’ve learned:

a) As the economy improves your publishing company will take off at long last in terms of revenues (vs just poor but friendly fans.)

b) You’ll have worked yourself to the bone in the meantime, so you eagerly begin to look for editorial hires with the increased revenues.

c) Since you’re about to hire someone who can take over your blog (after almost four years of postings you’d like to take a break), you figure, hey take a break and the new guy/gal can pick it up shortly.

d) You find out how incredibly hard it is to hire someone, well, blog-worthy who’s passionate about the topic, and has enough biz background and time to do a good job. But you keep hoping, researching, headhunting….

e) Six months go by. And you’ve become one of those annoying Bloggers — someone who started out all full of posts but then let the thing languish by the wayside.

f) And now it’s almost embarassing to start again. You feel so lame you sort of want to hide. Plus, if you do start over and the perfect hire takes ages more to present himself/herself, what if you get all tired and swept-up in other stuff again; and then stop blogging all over and lose any remaining shards of trust with your readers??

So, that’s where I am. I do have one possible excellent hire for this in sight. But it could take a couple of months before she’s ready and able to take this on. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Must-read Research Results on Search & Online Shopping

March 25th, 2004

Wow – I just spent the past 45 minutes blowing off email and phone calls to read a brand new report on the results of a focus group Enquiro Search Solutions conducted last month.

Although it focused on consumers, the data is highly relevant for b-to-b marketers as well. Some highlights:

– Landing pages and sites loaded with informational non-salesy materials such as specs, product photos, research, guides, reviews, etc., were much more likely to convert than overt sales messages.

– Aside from one demographic (mostly young men) who want to get shopping over with as quickly as possible, most searchers are extremely circuitous. They search multiple terms, click on multiple links, veer from retailer to review site to manufacturer and back again.

So, if you rely on simple measurement of view/click/convert to judge performance you are significantly underestimating your search campaign performance.

– If a brand comes up in a high organic position early in the process, it may result in a sale much later in the process, even if the searcher never clicks on that initial link. Search success is much more about building brand awareness than most of us guessed.

– Almost 80% of searchers skip over sponsored listings initially or entirely (especially Google users); only 21% will click to a second page of listings if they can’t find what they want on the first; and if a review site such as ConsumerReports.org shows up in the top organic listings it’s almost “guaranteed a 50% plus clickthrough.” Which means if your listing is nearby, you’re close to invisible in the glare of the review site’s glory.

– People won’t cross over the “anonymity threshold” to give your site any information about themselves until they have absolutely no option and are ready to engage in a significant relationship with your site (such as purchasing or signing up as a sales prospect with the intention of putting your brand on a short-list.)

Combine that fact with the data that 72% of searches are conducted with the mindset of researching prior to making an engagement decision, and there’s a problem with using search for direct response goals alone.

The vast majority of searchers hitting your landing page (or site) are not in a response mindset – are, indeed, highly resistant to the idea. It’s the old asking someone to marry you on the first date dilemma.

So, how can your landing page still convert the 28% who are ready, while gaining mindshare and future purchases from the 72% who are not? Plus, how do you measure the latter’s success?

That’s the dilemma we all face.

Anyway, enough of me babbling on and on. You can check out the research results for yourself. The 30-page PDF is complimentary, but there’s required registration (oh the irony):
http://www.enquiro.com/Downloads/

Marketing Experiment Diary Part II: Responses Flood In

March 18th, 2004

Since we launched our new experimental service – Marketer’s Desktop Resource Center – a week ago today, more than 500 of you have downloaded it. And everybody’s been emailing me with feedback like crazy. (Thanks.)

Here are the newest lessons I’ve learned from the whole thing:

Lesson #1. Offer RSS as an alternative

The vast majority of you wanted to know, “Is this RSS? If it’s not, why don’t you offer RSS?” Well, it’s not RSS. It’s a downloadable application like Weatherbug only it’s completely dedicated to MarketingSherpa content.

RSS doesn’t allow us to give you a useful toolbar, permanent links, or graphics (I have big plans). All users get is the story headline with a link. Plus you can’t measure RSS (easily at least), and we estimate fewer than 500,000 people have RSS readers installed. (Compared to tens of millions using downloads like ours.)

But, obviously many of those 500,000 are our readers. So Holly Hicks in our production department is working on starting an RSS feed for you in the next week. I’ll include a link in my Blog when it comes out.

Lesson #2. Corporate IT departments are cracking down

A bunch of marketers working for large companies wrote in that they had to ask their IT department’s permission before downloading anything.

The IT guy doesn’t know our brand name or trust us when we promise not to send pop-ads, or banners, or spy on users, or suck up their bandwidth unnecessarily. So, now we need to add extra tech facts to our FAQ on the download page to help user wanna-bes overcome their IT department’s suspicions.

Lesson #3. Twice daily pings are too many!

While everyone liked getting updates automatically, just as twice daily email would be too frequent, twice-daily “pings” were annoying.

The problem is we have new stories about twice a day, and I don’t want folks to complain because they missed something. So, now we’re working with Arcavista (our tech provider) to create a preferences form where users can say, “Only ping me when you have a story on a topic I’m particularly interested in.”

The update will take a few weeks (you know what tech dev is like), and in the meantime, I’m mulling over ping frequency fixes.

Lesson #4. Make it big enough to clearly read

I told the designers to make our application about as big as Weatherbug because I like the size and it’s got that cool “gizmo” factor. I was wrong.

Enough of you wrote in to say that you find the small size harder to read, that for our next update the designers will go bigger. Live and learn.

Useful links related to this Blog:

-> Part I of this Experiment Diary explaining how we came up with the new service in reaction to filter frustration, and 4 lessons I learned while developing it:
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2630

-> Web page where you can see a picture of the service and decide if you want to get your own complimentary copy:
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/desktop.html

MarketingSherpa Experiment Diary: Can a New Desktop Application Replace Email Newsletters?

March 11th, 2004

Last Thursday, Thomas Korte, International Product Marketing Manager over at Google, emailed me, “I just wanted to let you know that your newsletter has recently started to be classified as spam 🙁 when it is sent to my work email.”

Arrgh! Despite the fact that we’ve been researching how to get permission email past filters for two years now, I get notes like this all too frequently.

The problem is at-work email accounts. Corporate IT departments are so desperate to stem the spam influx that they hurl every filter they can at it — including content-based filters that are infamous for high “false positive” rates. And since we use words in our stories like “advertising,” “online marketing,” and “opt-in” these filters sometimes stop our issues.

We’ve leapt through all the hoops to get as much email through as possible, including getting our own dedicated IP address, sending story-summaries instead of full-stories (fewer total words means less stuff you can be filtered for), and switching consistently non-opening subscribers to text-only.

It worked – our open rates now run 55-67% depending on subject line. But I wasn’t satisfied.

So when Matthew DeGanon at Arcavista asked if I’d like to try offering a desktop application, powered by his tech, that sends content directly to readers’ PCs without going through email, I was very excited about the experiment.

I’m a big huge fan of Weatherbug – a desktop application more than 13 million people have downloaded to get weather news without having to go to email or a Web site. It’s fun, it’s cute, it’s useful, and it’s free. Hey, I thought, how cool would it be to launch a “SherpaBug”?

Well, it’s launching today. You can see for yourself:
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/desktop.html

And, here are four lessons I learned along the way:

Lesson #1. Set Goals Prior to Development

I’m horribly easily swept into doing projects because it will be really fun and cool. And then later I kick myself in the pants and say, “Was there an ROI worth mentioning?”

Example: We invested in creating a “Torture-a-Spammer” online game 18 months ago. The rationalization was that it would be a great viral marketing tool. Hundreds of thousands played it, but only 5% signed up as newsletter subscribers and they had a rotten, dreadful conversion rate to becoming MarketingSherpaStore customers. The experience was fun, but a waste of money.

Unmitigated creativity is not the path to business success. Setting goals and measuring results is.

So, I set a few worst case scenario assumptions in place prior to saying yes to the Arcavista project, including:

o If 1% of current readers download the application and keep it on their desktop for at least a year;

o and, these readers spend an average of $1 more per year than the average newsletter reader spends in our online store, presumably because they’ll see and click on more of our content than newsletter readers;

o and, production time cost to update and maintain the application with our articles would be lower than this extra $1 more per year per user we made;

o will this at least cover costs?

OK, this reasoning is a bit flawed because the people most likely to download a MarketingSherpa desktop application are probably also likely to be among our biggest fans, and thus more likely than most to spend more money anyway.

If I had a perfect customer database backend I’d be able to account for that. We’re still building it, but if you have one and you’re trying a similar experiment, be sure to include that factor in your calculations. (And then let me know your results.)

Lesson #2. Design will be hell

Think about the first Web site you were ever allowed to direct the design on. You wanted to go wild — and probably a lot of the ideas you had were dreadful from a usability standpoint.

(My first professional site in 1996 had round icons swooping about the page instead of a traditional navigation bar or readable text. Looked fabulous, but it was miserable to get around on.)

Although I yearned to take the format for a test-drive and get really creative, I knew unmitigated creativity does not a successful design make. Arcavista’s design team had some ideas, but let’s face it, these guys are not in my target audience or familiar with my brand. Their ideas looked like a military videogame suitable for male 20-somethings.

My Web designer had some ideas, but let’s face it, he’s a Web designer. His idea looked just like a little square Web page. Anybody downloading that would think, “and the point would be?”

I had some ideas, but let’s face it, I’m in love with MarketingSherpa so my idea was to overwhelm the poor user with 20 buttons to different parts of the site. It was nothing more than a giant, scary-long navigation bar.

After two months of dithering, I printed out a copy of everyone’s mock-ups and cut and pasted a new version together (yes, with scissors and tape) using the best bits of each.

I liked the way the Arvcavista guys made theirs look like a gizmo instead of a flat screen. I loved the colors from my Web designer. And a tiny handful of my buttons got tossed in as well.

It looks OK, but not as incredible as my first feverish dreams. But hey, we have years to evolve in. Plus, as more folks launch desktop applications, there will be more places for me to steal design ideas from.

Lesson #3. You can’t update apps as easily as email (or sites)

Once we settled on the final design, Arcavista made me sign a letter saying in effect, “This is the final design for version 1.0.” I thought they were a little admin-happy but whatever.

Whups.

When I called up a few days later to ask, “Hey, can we tweak that yellow a bit?” my account rep had to say, “Sorry, not unless you want to delay launch for a week.” I said, “Why? What’s the big deal? It’s a two-second tweak.”

Turns out something, that might be a two-second tweak for your Web site, is a much bigger deal for your desktop application. The guys have to make the change, then test it in the lab to make sure no other code got broken, then update the version… it all takes more time.

So, if you’re considering an application, you can’t make sudden, swift changes to your format creative even though it’s super easy to update the content inside the format. (We’re planning to do it about seven times per week.)

Lesson #4. Copywriting will be hell

Finally we were ready to launch. So I had to write the copy for the landing page to describe this wonderful new thing. Great. How?

If you say, “desktop application” many of us creative types shudder away. It’s a techy term that doesn’t sound remotely enticing. Neither does “bug”. Neither does “peer-to-peer device” which is what one friend suggested. And “spyware” is out of the question (especially since we’re not watching anything besides normal email stuff — how many users we get and then if any of the clicks turn into sales).

I ended up writing so much descriptive copy in an effort to explain what exactly this thing is, that the first landing page was frighteningly long. Nobody was going to read all that.

In the end, I cut and cut and danced around the issue entirely.

Because desktop applications are relatively new, there isn’t a term you can use like “Web site” that everyone will know what that is. You just have to describe the benefits and say “Free” and “New” and cross your fingers.

You can see the copy I wound up with on the info page. The good news is, it’s a Web page, so if the copy doesn’t work we can change it nearly instantly….

Let me know what you think — aholland@marketingSherpa.com

And thanks for your support.

http://www.marketingsherpa.com/desktop.html
http://www.arcavista.com

Tech nightmares happen even to the best of us

March 4th, 2004

I’ve come to the conclusion that any serious marketing training course should include sitting around cable TV to watch a few old episodes of Bewitched.

Remember how Darren Stevens would be working away on a great campaign at the ad agency and then a magic spell would mess it all up by turning the client into a chimp or something? That’s exactly what it feels like to be a marketer in the wonderful, ultra-measurable, Internet-age.

Last week an SVP of marketing for a very well known company, who I personally have admired for years, sent me a note turning down my invitation to speak at our upcoming Subscriptions Summit.

He explained, “We recently found there is a glitch in our ecommerce system and thus all marketing tests from the past have to be thrown out and redone. i.e. What we think we learned from tests is all in question because of system failures that lost orders.

Therefore, when I imagine what a group of my marketing peers would ask me on stage, I would feel like a phony trying to answer on this subject.”

When I read that, a big pile of guilt slid off my shoulders. Our marketing tech isn’t perfect either. We never measure everything I think we should – nor do we always have the time to pay attention to the results properly.

But I guess that’s condition normal for marketers these days. Tech SNAFUs are inevitable, and you can’t guilt yourself out for not being perfect all the time. I guess it’s just about doing our best and not letting that magic chimp thing bother us too much.

Your vendor nominations please…

February 26th, 2004

I’d like your input for some Buyer’s Guides projects we’re working on.

Whether you are a client, a potential client, or a vendor yourself, you can nominate any company you chose to these Guides. Every single nominated vendor will be reviewed for complimentary inclusion — and we try to include as many as possible.

Nominations only take a few seconds, and they are anonymous:

a. Buyer’s Guide to Email Broadcast Services 2nd Edition

Nominate email services that send out bulk (broadcast) messages for clients. Questions? Contact editor Jill Keogh at jillk@marketingsherpa.com:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=59232397756

b. Buyer’s Guide to Web Analytics

Nominate any or all software you would use to analyze your site’s traffic. Questions? Contact editor Terry Lund at terry@terrylund.com:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=84220365265

c. Buyer’s Guide to Selling Content Online

Nominate software/technology services you would need to sell content online, including PDFs, pay-per-view and subscriptions. Questions? Contact editor Andrew Benkard at andrewb@marketingsherpa.com
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=39901365264

Thanks for your support,

Anne

Anne Holland – Publisher
MarketingSherpa

San Diego Hair Salon Tests Local PPC Ads

February 19th, 2004

This week the New York Times ran a story that began, “Can small businesses be persuaded to pay for online advertising even if they do not sell their products or services on the Web?”

Well, hair salon owner Jet Rhys, told me the answer is, “Heck yes.”

Jet, a self-described “right-brainer” didn’t want anything to do with online at first. “I do hair. I’ve never even owned a computer.” But, her young staffers kept bugging her to put up a site, so when she discovered a client worked for the Red Door Interactive agency, she decided to try it.

Clients loved the site – especially the form where they could request a phone call to book an appointment. But Jet’s client base didn’t grow much … until her agency began testing local PPC search ads.

They tried using local terms such as “San Diego hair salon” in Overture and Google; and since Google started offering localized ad serving (where your ad only appears for searchers in selected zip codes) they’ve tested broader terms such as “hair cut.”

Results? Jet’s business has boomed, especially for expensive new services such as Japanese thermal straightening and hair extensions that consumers tend to research online. 30% of the Salon’s total appointment requests now come from the site, and roughly 50% of these are first-time customers.

Some ads have done as well as 6.25% CTR; and, Jet’s average click rate is a respectable 1.09%, with 1.5% of clicks converting to filling out the appointment form.

“It’s catapulted me into thinking I can never be without these buys. I’m able to take my blinkers off and see how I can grow in new services,” Jet told me.

If you’d like to check out Jet’s site, here you go:
http://www.jetrhys.com

Have you tested celebrity-spokesperson audio in ads?

February 12th, 2004

I get incredibly frustrated when I hear about a new marketing idea, but no one has any real-world results data.

This week I called around to a bunch of marketers who’d added a spokesperson headshot plus an audio clip to their site. “How many visitors click to hear the audio?” I asked. “Does it improve conversion rates?”

Nearly everyone said, “Oh, we’re not measuring it, but we figured it’s really cool so why not stick it up? It probably helps.” Arrgh! Finally I got a tidbit of data (see below for the Case Study.)

John O’Dwyer, who helps out his dad the famed Jack O’Dywer with his publication for the PR community, told me he’d been kicking around the idea of having sponsors add audio clips, of Jack briefly discussing their product, to their site ads.

John said, “It’s not too hard to create one of these things. It’s just Flash with audio popped in. People believe in something more when they hear an authority say it.” Plus, most audio clip tech companies allow your spokesperson literally phone in their message.

Which made me think, what about using audio for celebrity
endorsements online? Click here to listen to what so and so says about …. Could be anyone from a big-name tech analyst to a Hollywood star.

Has anyone tested it? Got data? Lemme know.

Article: Adding Audio to Your Business Web Site
http://www.marketingsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2595